RSS
 

Who initiated the job justification movement?

15 Apr

It’s one thing as part of a budget presentation to correlate the human resources associated with the work needs of a department (listing the number of superintendants, full/part time workers and students) and its quite another when each individual job is “justified” with masses of paper and preparation/presentation time out of all proportion to that used by staff to create and deliver the actual budget financial information.

Even the library board (which is supposed to be a board not part of the township employment structure) used the same format in its budget presentation, which indicates that somebody in the staff of the ToC has defined that job justification be this years method to obfuscate the financial information required for the council and the public to fully understand the financial standing of the township and WHY there is any need for a tax increase when most other townships have been able to minimize the impact of property taxes on their residents.

A fiefdom is something over which one dominant person or group exercises control and unfortunately when it comes to the budgets for Clearview it is becoming increasingly obvious that it is just such a fiefdom consisting of the CAO and 2 or 3 senior staff, rather than the elected representatives on council, who control everything related to the budget including the final outcome.

Unfortunately at least one councilor saw fit to “congratulate” staff on this job justification movement instead of getting down to the roots of why staff have pay and benefit packages at higher rates than are paid in the private sector and why they are not allocated the same vehicle standby charges that employees of private companies have to pay tax on!

 
Comments Off

Posted in Municipal issues

 

McGuinty about to trash Ontario…

15 Apr

On March 27, 2012 the Government of Ontario presented its proposed budget. The Minister of Finance, Dwight Duncan, tabled for the first reading in the legislature Bill 55 "Strong Action for Ontario Act (Budget Measures), 2012". However, Bill 55 is an omnibus bill amending 69 different statutes including:

- Endangered Species Act - Provincial Parks and Conservation Reserves Act - Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act - Public Lands Act - Crown Forest Sustainability Act - Niagara Escarpment Planning and Development Act.

These laws are prescribed under the Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993 (EBR) and any proposed changes should be posted on the EBR with a 30-day public review and comment period.

Omnibus Bill-55 is violating the public’s right to comment.

Contact your MP and ask him/her to make a stand to eliminate all references to amendments to Acts administered under the Environmental Bill of Rights from Bill 55, and failing that turn down Bill 55 in its entirety. We need stronger, not weaker, Environmental legislation to protect ourselves and future generations.

Read the rest of this entry »

 
Comments Off

Posted in Government, Provincial issues

 

Clearview Communicator Premier Issue

07 Apr

only1taxpayer.ca is pleased to announce the first issue of our printable newsletter, the “Clearview Communicator” aptly named to reflect the almost total lack of communication from our elected officials both in Clearview and at the county of Simcoe.

To receive your “Clearview Communicator” via email just contact us at newsletter@creemore.ca and we’ll add you to the mailing list and when each issue comes out you’ll be one of the first to know.

This first issue uncovers the way that the Township uses Budget to Budget (B2B) comparisons rather than comparing the budgeted values for 2012 against the actual audited figures from 2011 (A2B) and shows the massive differences in spending, wages, salaries and benefits that are far above what we are being told at the current budget meetings.

Here’s a taste of what is in the premier issue:

Using B2B the CAO’s salary could potentially increase by $11,101 from $116,000 to $127,101. but if you compare the potential for increase over the actual audited 2011 numbers and using the A2B comparison her salary could go up by $14,790 from $116,000 to $130,790.

Under B2B any “Bloat” that was in the 2011 budget flows on to the 2012 budget and maintains the original bloat, and that is why the roads department can always accommodate councils requests to come up with lower numbers so they can keep the increases to what THEY THINK is acceptable to taxpayers.

Click here_white to see the first issue.

 

SURVIVING=To carry on despite hardships or trauma

31 Mar

If there was one word that came out of the public budget meeting and used by one taxpayer to sum up the position of most of the people in the room, and as it turned out, some members of council it was
SURVIVING!

This meeting was a prime example of almost everything that is wrong with this council and previously identified on the only1taxpayer web site .

From the zero leadership of the Mayor (“its coming and we must be ready”) to the “lectures” delivered by Councilors Davidson and Preston and “planner” Michael Wynia (do they really have more life experience, experience and intelligence than most of us in that room?) to the tearful exhibition of Councilor Bronee (an indication that, for her own health, she might wish to retire) this was a prime example of almost everything that is wrong and needs to be corrected in, and by, this council.

Out of a total time allocation (What happened to – “We’ll be here until you’re finished”?) of just a little over 2-1/2 hours ONLY a little over 40 minutes was provided for the taxpayers to START asking questions. NO offers to extend the meeting, accept questions by Email or (in light of the interest shown by the public) any offer from the Mayor to allow an extra meeting devoted solely to the answering of questions from taxpayers without the doodling on the extravagantly expensive electronic whiteboard that the IT staff seems to feel they need to replace far less costly paper for their scribbles! (IT is one budget that needs to be gone over with a fine tooth comb to eliminate these kinds of unnecessary frills, purchased, it would appear, for the ego gratification of staff)

“Tell us what you want?” is a total cop-out!

It’s the responsibility of each councilor to determine from COMMUNICATION with the broader constituency using surveys and town hall meetings to find out what the taxpayer wants and IS ABLE TO FUND BEFORE even starting the budget process. That cannot take place just by attending hockey games at the arena or from listening to special interest groups who have the ear of elected officials.

Ward 4 is VERY lucky! Thank you Thom Paterson for holding the ONLY town hall meeting covering this budget and getting the REAL input from taxpayers concerned enough to attend; you seem to understand your responsibilities to the taxpayer and value their input!

This budget will be passed REGARDLESS of anything that was said by anyone at the meeting, the 7.24% increase in salaries and benefits for “administration” will go through (funny how Councilor Davidson missed quoting that departments number), the CAO’s salary and benefits can rise to slightly under $125,000 and the good life will go on at Gideon Street for another year!

The water/sewer costs have ALREADY BEEN PASSED and are not in the budget process so you’re up for the 61% increase in that cost regardless. That decision was made quietly long before the required public input to the budget and is what will cause me and others like me to move out of Clearview leaving everyone else to pick up the tab for the increased costs of services that eventually they will not be able to afford.

It’s what I call the “Clearview death spiral” and it could be stopped IF ONLY we had a Mayor with the ability to lead, prepared to communicate equally with everyone and open to having his councils errors in judgment (the full costs for the “HUB” for example) made public, supported by a majority of councilors prepared to make the really hard decisions on cutting CORE costs that remain un-analyzed and untouched by council each and every budget.

Each of the councilors that spoke and the Mayor (who did not) seem to have “hit the wall” when it comes to representing their constituencies. Maybe its time for them to step aside and let in some new blood that’s prepared to perform the analysis and make those hard decisions that would allow the current residents of Clearview to remain in their homes. If that occurs, let’s also go away from the ward system to an open form of council with two or more less councilors to bring representation levels and costs more in line with other municipalities.

Thanks to everyone who sent me their impressions of the budget meeting. The Mayor refused to answer my request for a “public table” to be manned by volunteers on fixed incomes that this budget will probably cause to leave Clearview so I deliberately stayed out of the room and let everyone “attempt” to get their questions answered. Most of these comments come from concerned citizens who were in the room and subjected to the attitudes of the various participants from the Township of Clearview.

The Mayor has a “discretionary expense fund” that can be used for functions benefiting the community, maybe it would be possible to tap that fund to pay back the almost $500 spent by taxpayers (many on fixed incomes) for printing and mailing that resulted in getting the huge numbers in attendance!

Peter Lomath

 

Garbage – largest contract EVER for Simcoe County

29 Mar

Staff recommendation carries the day despite spirited opposition from Penetanguishene mayor

By Kate Harries AWARE Simcoe March 27 2012

Penetanguishene Mayor Gerry Marshall today failed in his bid to open up the county’s Request for Proposals process so Simcoe County councilors get basic information about bids on the new waste collections contract ahead of approving negotiations with a preferred bidder chosen by staff.

And although Marshall garnered some support for his view that the county should share the business between at least two contractors, two thirds of council were content to go with the staff recommendation in favour of opening negotiations with an unidentified “Proposal A.”

Staff will reveal who the successful bidder is after the contract is signed.

“I like to be in possession of all the facts before making my decision,” Marshall said in an impassioned speech that drew applause from the public gallery.

Marshall pointed out that councilors have no idea what the total dollar value is of the favoured bid in what has been described as the largest contract ever let by the county – covering seven years with a two-year option to renew.

“Overall the report leaves me floundering,” he said.

How did our Mayor and Deputy stand on this UNRECORDED vote and what is this going to do to the 2.00% tax increase from county next year?

Read more

 
Comments Off

Posted in County issues, Municipal issues

 

Can you afford a 33% tax increase by 2016?

22 Mar

March 29 at 6.30 – Council chambers in Stayner is your chance to tell council that you cannot AFFORD their budget

Here are the increases that this budget will bring for the next four years?

Property tax INCREASE by 2016 25% or $725.78

Water/sewer INCREASE by 2016 61% or $473.05

Residency cost INCREASE by 2016 33% or $1,198.83

The first three people to whom I showed these projections had a common response:

I’ll have to move out of Clearview!

To see the “math” please visit the budget 2012 pages

 

 

Why did you create only1taxpayer.ca ?

29 Feb

only1taxpayer.ca is a response from a concerned taxpayer suffering under the burden of a fixed income and out-of-control property taxes to the refusal by the staff and councilors for the Township of Clearview to respond to questions related to expenditures that appear in some cases to be the result of covering up of errors and omissions by staff.

For almost two years we have been trying to find out what the “private” storm sewer between 75 Edward Street and Mary street cost, who was paying for it, why the Township had to undertake the work and who is on the hook for the ongoing costs of electricity for the pumps.

A simple request one would think, certainly not anything that needed to be hidden.

Read the rest of this entry »

 
Comments Off

Posted in Municipal issues

 

Still not getting it….

21 Feb

Deputy Mayor Alicia Savage has still not got it – There is ONLY1TAXPAYER!

At the meeting held last Saturday about the Collingwood Street bridge over the Mad River in Creemore Ms. Savage asserted that we should be happy about the enforced building of a new two-lane bridge with the architectural significance of a “concrete block” because $500,000 of the costs will come from county development charges, money that could be far better used fixing our existing roads and making them safer for people who actually use them.

Read the rest of this entry »

 
 

A need for changes in the budget process

13 Feb

The current Clearview “public” budget meetings are a perfect example of the need for change in which the “public” actually be allowed to participate in EVERY aspect of the budget process rather than being treated as “silent spectators at an expensive cake cutting”.

Read the rest of this entry »

 
Comments Off

Posted in Municipal issues

 

ACCOUNTANTS – some help needed please….

11 Feb

The latest census figures for Clearview show a decline in population of 2.5% between 2006 and 2011.

Since it does not appear from what we have seen during the current round of budget meetings that any members of council are looking at why the 2012 budget is so “bloated” we need some help in determining what parts of the current 2012 budget have “bloated” since 2006 beyond the basics due to Canada’s inflation rate and why the number of staff has increased over that time.

The 2006 budget information is available HERE – note that this is a concise and readable document.

The 2012 budget information is available HERE – note this is a “collection” of poorly associated documents seemingly designed to obfuscate the costs of providing services, another step backward in time for Clearview.

DILIGENT COUNCILORS – should be asking to see the numbers for added staff, their salaries & benefits. legal, audit and other “required” expenses between 2006 and 2012 and asking WHY we are not able to run this township with the same or less numbers of people than we were using in 2006.

Population has dropped 2.5% from 14,088 (2006)  to 13,734 (2011)

Clearview township portion of the property tax dollar has increased from 43 % (2006) to 51% (2011).

The county portion of the property tax dollar has increased from 27% (2006) to 28% (2011).

The education portion of the property tax dollar has shrunk from 30% (2006) to 21% (2011).

The simple view says that there should not have been any need to increase the number of employees since 2006 if the township is only providing the same level of service that was available in 2006.

We’d like to see staff and councils justification for the increases that have taken place and that the new 2012 budget (adjusted for Canada’s inflation rate from 2006 to 2012) go back to the same level of staffing and costs as was needed in 2006.

Over to our councilors……..(who have each been provided with the link to this blog subject)